|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Book Fills Gap in Art Therapy Literature |
| Providing both insight and encouragement |
|
Ambrose Musiyiwa (amusiyiwa)  |
 Email Article
 Print Article
|
|
|
|
Published 2006-05-20 15:10 (KST) |
|
|
|
| | | Group Analytic Art Therapy | | | |
By Gerry McNeilly
Jessica Kingsley Publishers
240 pages
GBP £18.99. US$24.95 | | | | |
Gerry McNeilly's "Group Analytic Art Therapy" fills a gap in group art therapy literature on both sides of the Atlantic.
It highlights the deficiencies in group art therapy literature, and the sparseness of research in art therapy, in the United Kingdom. The book reinforces the need for art therapy theoreticians and professionals to continue researching aspects of their profession and writing about their efforts.
It encourages them to reflect on their practice and to share those reflections with the wider community of professionals working in therapeutic enterprises.
McNeilly observes: "There is only one art therapy journal in the U.K., 'Inscape,' and this has published little on group art therapy ... I'm aware of only two books that address groups specifically from a psychotherapy perspective: 'Group Interactive Therapy' (Waller 1993) and 'Art Psychotherapy Groups' (Skaife and Huet 1998), which covers a wide range of clinical settings from a number of British art therapists."
 |  | |  Group Analytic Art Therapy. | | | ©2005 Gerry McNeilly | He contrasts this state of affairs in British art therapy with the United States, where a large body of group art literature has been produced even though very little of it considers art psychotherapy groups. "Group Analytic Art Therapy" is divided into two parts: "The Origins" and "The Portuguese Papers -- new developments."
The book outlines the history of the theory and practice of group analytic art therapy. It builds on key concepts of group analysis and discusses how these can be adapted to art therapy groups.
In part one, McNeilly recounts how his involvement with groups, in general, and group art therapy in particular, started and developed. He examines, among other things, the concepts of the "group as a whole," "the individual in the group," transference constellations, and the place of interpretation and the bearing this has on the individual, the group and the therapist in a group art therapy session.
In part two, McNeilly extends the well-held perspectives on the triangle concept into a three-dimensional appreciation that is more integrated with group analytic approaches. He looks at resonance and links it to intuition and wisdom, complexity, subtlety and simplicity. He illustrates how the concepts of cross-fertilization and grafting, as well as the interconnectedness between content, process and the structural aspects of group analysis are shown in the relationship between the art and the verbal group. He also discusses the matrix, the concept of the pattern and defines "the fullness of emptiness" as a bond between matrix and pattern.
Throughout the book, McNeilly draws on his own experiences as a child, a student, a musician, a group analytic therapy trainee and an art therapist. He presents his material in a manner that is easy to read and follow.
I hope that in the book's next edition, McNeilly will tighten his hold over how the narrative is structured and eliminate a few flaws. For example, on page 154, McNeilly writes, "Intuition is spoken less about less in group analysis ..." Did he intend to say, "Intuition is spoken about less in group analysis?" On page 171, he tells us that Helen drew seven ghosts but then goes on to talk about nine ghosts and how these represent the age at which she was abandoned.
On page 52, McNeilly uses a quotation from when S. H. Foulkes was writing about the group and the individual and goes on to argue, among other things, that with Foulkes' definition in mind, it is easy to see how the score of group analysis can be transcribed to group analytic art therapy. On pages 188-189, McNeilly uses the same quotation and repeats the comments he had given on page 52.
The book would be more effective if the narrative was as chronological as possible. An attempt has been made to do this but the reader still has to flick back to earlier pages and chapters constantly to review concepts that are mentioned again, sometimes in greater depth. Keeping the narrative strictly chronological will reduce unnecessary repetition.
In addition, in almost every chapter McNeilly tells the reader that he will not or cannot discuss certain aspects of the subject because space is limited. He also uses the phrase "in conclusion" in almost every chapter. These two habits are irritating and disrupt the narrative.
Despite these minor flaws, "Group Analytic Art Therapy" is an important contribution to the still relatively small body of group art therapy literature. Art therapists, group analysts, psychotherapists and art educators will find the book useful for the insight it gives into the theory and practice of group art psychotherapy.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
©2006 OhmyNews
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Comments Note: Kindly refrain from personal attacks and profanity. |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
How worried are you about the H1N1 influenza virus? |
|
 |
| * Vote to see the result. |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSS
Linked Story - 
Del.icio.us
Digg 
reddit
Y! MyWeb
.jpg)
