2020-02-22 22:13 KST  
Global Voices Online - The world is talking. Are you listening?
Mixed Reaction to IAEA Report
Iran and Washington both claim equal vindication from ElBaradei report
Chris Gelken (chrisg)     Print Article 
Published 2007-11-16 15:46 (KST)   
The latest scorecard on Iran셲 nuclear programs was never going to be enough to satisfy Washington, London and Paris. And the vague language contained in Mohammed ElBaradei셲 report on Thursday didn셳 disappoint.

Hailed by the Iranians as a vindication of their 쐏eaceful nuclear program, the Security Council allies were quick to cite the report as evidence of Iran셲 failure to 쐁ome clean with the nuclear watchdog.

OMNI's New Approach to Citizen Journalism
[Opinion] Democracy's Downfall
Technology Can Save Money, Planet
[Opinion] Iran Defends Peaceful 'Right'
Couchsurfing in Gaza
Education for a Scientific Society
Negev 'Heritage Site' Vandalized
Voices After the Shots
Taliban Attacks Kabul Weeks Before Elections
Creeping Islamisation in Gaza?
Washington was particularly quick to pounce with its U.N. ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad issuing statements before most people had finished reading the 10-page document.

"It is clear that Iran has not fully cooperated, he declared at a hasty press briefing, 쏻e believe we need to move forward with another resolution in the Security Council to impose additional sanctions on Iran.

Khalilzad didn셳 mention the part of the report that clearly stated there has been no deviation on the part of Iran to weaponize its nuclear program, and that the country has demonstrated substantial cooperation with the nuclear agency.

Taking note of Tehran셲 쐓ubstantial cooperation would have diminished Khalilzad셲 next dramatic assertion that, 쏷his is one of the most important issues that we face. The Issue of Iran셲 nuclear program, because Iran is seeking regional hegemony, because Iran has ties with terrorists, and because Iran supports insurgent groups in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Scores of political analysts would likely add that the above statement would also describe the United States, perhaps substituting 쐍uclear program with 쐌issile shield.

The ambassador did not provide any new proof to support the allegations against Iran.

He did cite some wording in the report that suggested Iran had been responding to IAEA enquiries 쏿ctively rather than 쐏roactively -- meaning that Tehran delivered everything that was asked of it, but didn셳 volunteer any information that wasn셳 requested.

The implication that Tehran is still trying to hide something was made very clear.

Iran셲 쏿ctive rather than 쐏roactive cooperation with the nuclear energy watchdog led Elbaradei to remark in his report that, 쏷he agency셲 knowledge about Iran셲 current nuclear program is diminishing.

A number of publications in the Western media have followed Khalilzad셲 lead and much of their coverage has focused on the negative, paying scant attention to the bulk of ElBaradei셲 generally positive report and the response made by Iranian officials.

For example, ElBaradei said Iran has made 쐓ubstantial progress and that the IAEA had been able to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material in Iran.

The report said the agency had been able to certify that Iran셲 statements on its highly controversial P-1 and P-2 centrifuge programs are consistent with the finding of the agency셲 inspectors.

Responding to the less favorable elements of the report, Iran셲 ambassador to the IAEA, Ali Asghar Soltaniyeh told Tehran-based PressTV, 쏷he matter is perhaps simply explained.

Soltaniyeh said after Iran was first sent to the Security Council over its nuclear program, many non-technical and international political bodies became involved. As a consequence, the Iranian parliament ordered the government to limit its cooperation with the IAEA and simply conform to its legal obligations under the Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement.

"It means we stopped our voluntary cooperation, he said, 쐗e limited our cooperation to what we were legally obliged to do and that is what the [IAEA] director general is referring to.

Soltaniyeh was saying that Iran became 쏿ctive in its sharing of information, rather than 쐏roactive -- that is, not offering information above and beyond its legal commitments.

Under these circumstances it is understandable that the volume of information on Iran셲 nuclear program would 쐂iminish.

Soltaniyeh added, however, that over the past several months Iran has actually cooperated beyond its legal obligations in the Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement.

He pointed out that the IAEA has confirmed that the Natanz enrichment facility is under perhaps the strictest inspection regime anywhere in the world.

"Apart from the cameras and other inspection equipment, he said, 쐔he facility has been subject to seven unannounced inspections by agency officials.

The IAEA report confirmed the Natanz facility is enriching uranium to four percent, 쏞onfirming that the plant is designed for and producing low enriched plutonium suitable only as fuel for nuclear power plants, Soltaniyeh said.

Consequently, he said, there is no justification whatsoever for accusations of proliferation.

Natanz is home to the centrifuges so often cited in the statements of Bush administration officials and the Western media as being capable of producing weapons grade material for the production of a nuclear bomb.

Experts confirm that with such a robust inspection in place, it would be virtually impossible for the Iranians to divert any materials for a weapons program.

Responding to calls by Washington for a further round of sanctions, Soltaniyeh, pointed out that the last resolution adopted in March of this year ordered Iran to immediately cease re-processing nuclear materials.

"The IAEA has reported there is no indication of any ongoing reprocessing related activities, Soltaniyeh said, 쏶o this is a clear indication and proof that those resolutions have no legal and technical justification.

Mr. ElBaradei셲 report concludes, he said, that there is no reprocessing activity in Iran, 쏷herefore how can we be expected to suspend an activity that doesn셳 exist.

Iran셲 chief nuclear negotiator, Saeed Jalili, lashed out at countries that continue to accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons. 쏷hey have offered no evidence to support their allegations, he said, 쏿nd at the same time, these same countries possess and develop nuclear weapons themselves.

Jalili said Tehran has consistently supported nuclear disarmament and criticized the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
Author셲 comment:
The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1747 adopted in March, 2007, contains the following paragraph:

"Recalling the resolution of the IAEA Board of Governors which states that a solution to the Iranian nuclear issue would contribute to global non-proliferation efforts and to realizing the objective of a Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction, including their means of delivery.

No UNSC resolution has ever called for Israel to open its nuclear facilities and declare its estimated 130-200 nuclear warheads.

While the IAEA did admit to gaps in its knowledge regarding Iran셲 nuclear programs, according to experts, these 쐅aps generally covered areas that Iran is currently under no legal obligation to report under the terms of its membership of the IAEA and as a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Essentially the sanctions are based on 쐓uspicions that Iran may be seeking weapons of mass destruction, and not hard evidence.

According to this and earlier IAEA reports, Iran is conducting its nuclear program in an open and transparent manner and within the legal parameters of its international agreements.
©2007 OhmyNews
Other articles by reporter Chris Gelken

Add to :  Add to Del.icio.usDel.icio.us |  Add to Digg this Digg  |  Add to reddit reddit |  Add to Y! MyWeb Y! MyWeb

Ronda Hauben
Netizens Question Cause of Cheonan Tragedy
Michael Werbowski
[Opinion] Democracy's Downfall
Michael Solis
Arizona's Immigration Bill and Korea
Yehonathan Tommer
Assassination in Dubai
[ESL/EFL Podcast] Saying No
Seventeenth in a series of English language lessons from Jennifer Lebedev...
  [ESL/EFL] Talking About Change
  [ESL/ EFL Podcast] Personal Finances
  [ESL/EFL] Buying and Selling
How worried are you about the H1N1 influenza virus?
  Very worried
  Somewhat worried
  Not yet
  Not at all
    * Vote to see the result.   
  copyright 1999 - 2020 ohmynews all rights reserved. internews@ohmynews.com Tel:+82-2-733-5505,5595(ext.125) Fax:+82-2-733-5011,5077